Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Grading Handicapped Pupils: Review and Position Statement

Dale Carpenter

Received an EdD in special education from Auburn University

A review of grading issues, philosophies, and recommendations is provided with implications and specific suggestions for grading mainstreamed handicapped pupils at the secondary level. A synthesis of available literature examines the wide range of viewpoints regarding optimal grading practices for general students and for remedial and handicapped pupils. A position statement related directly to grading secondary mainstreamed handicapped pupils concludes the paper.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 6, No. 4, 54-59 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/074193258500600409
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
M. Silva, D. D. Munk, and W. D. Bursuck
Grading Adaptations for Students With Disabilities
Intervention in School and Clinic, November 1, 2005; 41(2): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
D. D. Munk and W. D. Bursuck
What Report Card Grades Should and Do Communicate: Perceptions of Parents of secondary Students With and Without Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 2001; 22(5): 280 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
E. A. Polloway, M. H. Epstein, W. D. Bursuck, T. W. Roderique, J. L. McConeghy, and M. Jayanthi
Classroom Grading: A National Survey of Policies
Remedial and Special Education, May 1, 1994; 15(3): 162 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
J. W. Rojewski, R. R. Pollard, and G. D. Meers
Grading Mainstreamed Special Needs Students: Determining Practices and Attitudes of Secondary Vocational Educators Using a Qualitative Approach
Remedial and Special Education, January 1, 1991; 12(1): 7 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
D. Carpenter and L. B. Grantham
A Statewide Investigation of Grading Practices and Opinions Concerning Mainstreamed Handicapped Pupils
Assessment for Effective Intervention, October 1, 1985; 11(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]