Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0741932508321011v1
30/5/300    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpkins, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Scruggs, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differentiated Curriculum Enhancements in Inclusive Fifth-Grade Science Classes

Pamela McCrea Simpkins

Fairfax County Public Schools, Virginia

Margo A. Mastropieri

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Thomas E. Scruggs

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, tscruggs{at}gmu.edu

Sixty-one normally achieving and at-risk fifth-grade students (of whom three had learning disabilities), in three classrooms, were taught two 5-week science units via experimental or control conditions in which treatment order and unit of instruction were counterbalanced. In the control condition, students received typical instruction, with teacher lecture and discussion, textbook reading, and worksheet exercise completion. In the experimental condition, students received differentiated curriculum enhancements, in which multitiered activities were undertaken by students in a classwide peer tutoring format. Analysis of gain score data revealed that students scored higher on production tests, but not identification tests, when in the experimental condition. Student and teacher reports indicated a high degree of satisfaction with experimental methods and materials.

Key Words: science • classwide peer tutoring • inclusion • students at risk • students with learning disabilities

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 30, No. 5, 300-308 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0741932508321011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?