Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coutinho, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oswald, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

State Variation in Gender Disproportionality in Special Education

Findings and Recommendations

Martha J. Coutinho

East Tennessee State University

Donald P. Oswald

Virginia Commonwealth University, in Richmond, Virginia

Gender disproportionality in special education has been apparent for many years, reflected in male-to-female ratios that range from about 1.5:1 to 3.5:1. The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of disproportionate representation for the disability conditions of learning disability (LD), serious emotional disturbance (SED), and mental retardation (MR) at the state, regional, and national levels. Using data collected by the U.S. Office for Civil Rights, we examined the hypothesis that current variations across states in gender disproportionality should be small, and similar to rates for the nation as a whole. Substantial variations in state rates for students with LD and SED were observed. We also examined the hypothesis that states serving relatively fewer students for a given disability are likely to have greater male overrepresentation. This hypothesis was generally supported for students with LD but not for students with MR or SED. We examined factors related to state policies for students with MR and SED that might help to account for these findings. We conclude with recommendations for research to better understand the basis for gender disproportionality and with several practical implications for policy review and response related to gender disproportionality at the regional, state, and national levels.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 26, No. 1, 7-15 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/07419325050260010201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
P. L. Morgan, G. Farkas, and Qiong Wu
Kindergarten Predictors of Recurring Externalizing and Internalizing Psychopathology in the Third and Fifth Grades
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, June 1, 2009; 17(2): 67 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
D. S. Mandell, J. K. Davis, K. Bevans, and J. P. Guevara
Ethnic Disparities in Special Education Labeling Among Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, March 1, 2008; 16(1): 42 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
L. A. Reddy, S. I. Pfeiffer, and T. M. Files-Hall
Use of the Devereux Scales of Mental Disorders for Children and Adolescents with Emotional Disturbance
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 2007; 25(4): 356 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]