Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troia, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Migrant Students with Limited English Proficiency

Can Fast ForWord LanguageTM Make a Di ference in Their Language Skills and Academic Achievement?

Gary A. Troia

College of Education at the University of Washington, gtroia{at}u.washington.edu

This study evaluated the efficacy of the computer-assisted intervention program known as Fast ForWord LanguageTM in a sample of migrant students in Grades 1 through 6 who were native Spanish speakers. Fast ForWord LanguageTM combines intensive training in multiple receptive English language skills with adaptive acoustic waveform lengthening and amplification to purportedly accelerate the English language learning skills of children who are nonnative English language speakers. Students either were randomly assigned to a treatment or no-contact control condition or were matched on grade, English language proficiency, and nonverbal IQ. All students were assessed in five domains before and immediately after the 4- to 8-week intervention: (a) spoken English language proficiency; (b) oral language competency; (c) phonological awareness; (d) basic reading skills; and (e) classroom behavior. Except for performance on a measure of sight-word recognition, on which children in the treatment group achieved a significantly greater gain than those in the control group, changes in test scores from pretest to posttest were equivalent for the two groups. However, when students who were least fluent in spoken English in each group were compared, the children in the treatment group demonstrated superior gains in expressive language, sight-word recognition, and pseudoword decoding. Thus, Fast ForWord LanguageTM had a substantial, albeit limited impact on the oral language skills and reading performance of migrant children in this study. However, due to methodological weaknesses and limited treatment fidelity, the study results must be interpreted cautiously.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 25, No. 6, 353-366 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/07419325040250060301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
J. E. Gonzalez and B. M. Uhing
Home Literacy Environments and Young Hispanic Children's English and Spanish Oral Language: A Communality Analysis
Journal of Early Intervention, March 1, 2008; 30(2): 116 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
C. J. Johnson
Getting Started in Evidence-Based Practice for Childhood Speech-Language Disorders
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 20 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]