Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joseph, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Seery, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Where Is the Phonics?

A Review of the Literature on the Use of Phonetic Analysis with Students with Mental Retardation

Laurice M. Joseph

Ohio State University, joseph.21{at}osu.edu

Mary Ellen Seery

University of Dayton

The purpose of this article is to review studies conducted in the last 12 years that consisted of examining the use of phonetic analysis strategies and/or phonics instruction with students with mental retardation. We conducted computer data-based searches and a manual search of 15 journals published from 1990 to 2002. Only 7 studies emerged that consisted of the use of phonetic analysis (making letter—sound correspondences) with individuals with mental retardation. Outcome measures varied across studies. However, no studies in the last 12 years focused on examining the effectiveness of direct/explicit phonics instruction with children with mental retardation. Findings from the 7 studies not emphasizing direct/explicit instruction revealed that individuals with mental retardation have the potential to benefit from phonic analysis strategies and/or instruction. Clearly, further research is needed before substantial conclusions can be derived. Suggestions for future research are provided.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 25, No. 2, 88-94 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/07419325040250020301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language Learning and EducationHome page
J. Rix
Educating a Syndrome?: Seeking a Balance Between Identifying a Learning Profile and Delivering Inclusive Education
Language Learning and Education, October 1, 2009; 16(3): 97 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
Y. Goddard and L. Rinderknecht
Using Basic Reading Skills Instruction and Formative Assessments to Teach an Adult With Traumatic Brain Injury to Read: A Case Study
Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 2009; 30(5): 283 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Focus Autism Other Dev DisablHome page
E. Tucker Cohen, K. Wolff Heller, P. Alberto, and L. D. Fredrick
Using a Three-Step Decoding Strategy With Constant Time Delay to Teach Word Reading to Students With Mild and Moderate Mental Retardation
Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, June 1, 2008; 23(2): 67 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]