Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, S. M.R.
Right arrow Articles by Westby, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Prenatal Drug Exposure

Implications for Personnel Preparation

Silvana M.R. Watson

Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, swatson{at}odu.edu

Carol E. Westby

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

In this descriptive study, a group of 34 school-age children who had been prenatally and environmentally exposed to drugs or alcohol were identified. Qualitative information from interviews and observations was organized and analyzed in matrices to determine the predominant characteristics of this population and educators' beliefs and attitudes about working with these students. Interviews and anecdotal records written in the children's files suggested that teachers perceived these students as distractible, lazy, stubborn, and impulsive. Some educators knew the children were drug exposed, and others did not. Educators' attitudes and selected interventions were related to their knowledge regarding the possible basis for the children's difficulties. Those who were aware that the children had been prenatally exposed to drugs or alcohol seemed to be willing to adjust their expectations and to modify the learning environment to attend to their students' needs. These educators did not punish their students for being off task; instead, they verbally, physically, or visually prompted their students to stay on task. These findings have direct implications for personnel preparation. Lack of knowledge of children's deficits can lead educators to choose inappropriate interventions. The need for training is clear if professionals and caregivers want to make a difference in the lives of these students.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 24, No. 4, 204-214 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/07419325030240040401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LSHSSHome page
J. Henry, M. Sloane, and C. Black-Pond
Neurobiology and Neurodevelopmental Impact of Childhood Traumatic Stress and Prenatal Alcohol Exposure
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 99 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
C. E. Westby
Child Maltreatment: A Global Issue
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, April 1, 2007; 38(2): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Communication Disorders QuarterlyHome page
S. M. R. Watson and C. E. Westby
Strategies for Addressing the Executive Function Impairments of Students Prenatally Exposed to Alcohol and Other Drugs
Communication Disorders Quarterly, January 1, 2003; 24(4): 194 - 204.
[Abstract] [PDF]