Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stempien, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Differences in Job Satisfaction Between General Education and Special Education Teachers

Implications for Retention

Lori R. Stempien

Catholic Social Services of Monroe in Michigan

Roger C. Loeb

Department of Behavioral Sciences at The University of Michigan/Dearborn

The occupational field of special education has been particularly vulnerable to losing its well-trained professional staff. Academic preparation and training of these teachers is costly and time-consuming, and replacing them is difficult. The present study compared the satisfactions and dissatisfactions of teachers of emotionally/behaviorally impaired students in special education, teachers of students in general education, and teachers responsible for both groups of students. Teachers of students in special education programs were found to be the most dissatisfied. Specific stresses and frustrations, both from within and from outside the classroom, were found to be associated with the dissatisfaction. The difficulties were particularly common in younger, less experienced special education teachers. The implications of these findings are discussed, and recommendations aimed at improving job satisfaction for special education teachers are presented.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 23, No. 5, 258-267 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/07419325020230050101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
K. K. Stang and B. M. Lyons
Effects of Modeling Collaborative Teaching for Pre-Service Teachers
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, August 1, 2008; 31(3): 182 - 194.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
P. LePage, S. Nielsen, and E. J. Fearn
Charting the Dispositional Knowledge of Beginning Teachers in Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2008; 31(2): 77 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
G. D. Campbell-Whatley
Recruiting and Retaining of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Groups in Special Education: Defining the Problem
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2003; 26(4): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [PDF]