|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Influence of Sociodemographics and Gender on the Disproportionate Identification of Minority Students as Having Learning Disabilities
Martha J. Coutinho
Department of Human Development and Learning at East Tennessee State University, coutinho{at}etsu.edu
Donald P. Oswald
Department of Psychiatry at Virginia Commonwealth University
Al M. Best
Department of Biostatistics at Virginia Commonwealth University
The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent of gender and race/ethnicity disproportionality among students identified as having learning disabilities (LD) and to investigate relationships between disproportionality and sociodemographic factors. Using nationally representative data collected by the U.S. Office for Civil Rights, this study examined the effects of gender, ethnicity, and sociodemographic factors on the proportion of students who are identified as having LD. Results indicated a clear association between ethnicity and gender and the odds of being identified as a student with LD. Sociodemographic factors for a school district were also found to be strongly associated with the proportion of students identified as having LD. A logistic regression model that included the nine sociodemographic variables, gender, and race, was significantly better at predicting LD identification than a model that included sociodemographic predictors alone. Adjusted odds ratios illustrated how the likelihood of identifying LD changes when sociodemographic influences are taken into account. Findings indicated that both individual student characteristics and district sociodemographic characteristics are important in determining the likelihood of LD identification and that the impact of the sociodemographic characteristics is different for each of the gender-ethnicity groups.
Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 23, No. 1,
49-59 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/074193250202300107

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Oesterreich and M. G. Knight
Facilitating Transitions to College for Students With Disabilities From Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds
Intervention in School and Clinic,
May 1, 2008;
43(5):
300 - 304.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Blanchett
Disproportionate Representation of African American Students in Special Education: Acknowledging the Role of White Privilege and Racism
Educational Researcher,
August 1, 2006;
35(6):
24 - 28.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Skiba, L. Poloni-Staudinger, A. B. Simmons, L. Renae Feggins-Azziz, and C.-G. Chung
Unproven Links: Can Poverty Explain Ethnic Disproportionality in Special Education?
Journal of Special Education,
November 1, 2005;
39(3):
130 - 144.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Salend and L. M. Garrick Duhaney
Understanding and Addressing the Disproportionate Representation of Students of Color in Special Education
Intervention in School and Clinic,
March 1, 2005;
40(4):
213 - 221.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Coutinho and D. P. Oswald
State Variation in Gender Disproportionality in Special Education: Findings and Recommendations
Remedial and Special Education,
February 1, 2005;
26(1):
7 - 15.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Kea, G. D. Campbell-Whatley, and K. Bratton
Culturally Responsive Assessment for African American Students with Learning and Behavioral Challenges
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2003;
29(1):
27 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Sutton, E. J. Nowacek, A. M. Capone, R. M. Hausman, K. C. Stoiber, and G. A. Tindal
Assessment of Students from Geographically Diverse Rural Areas: Emerging Research from Four Federally Funded Projects
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2003;
29(1):
53 - 67.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Salend, L. M. Garrick Duhaney, and W. Montgomery
A Comprehensive Approach to Identifying and Addressing Issues of Disproportionate Representation
Remedial and Special Education,
October 1, 2002;
23(5):
289 - 299.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|