Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ryser, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Strengths-Based Assessment Differences Across Students with LD and EBD

Robert Reid

Department of Special Education at the University of Nebraska, rreid2{at}unl.edu

Michael H. Epstein

Dena A. Pastor

Quantitative Methods Program at the University of Texas at Austin

Gail R. Ryser

PRO-ED Inc. in Austin, Texas

Current assessment techniques for children with learning disabilities (LD) and emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) are typically focused on identifying deficits. In this study we investigated the use of an alternative strength-based perspective, using the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS). Results showed that the BERS discriminated among students with LD and EBD and those who were nondisabled. The use of the BERS improved significantly over chance in classifying students with EBD and nondisabled students, but not in classifying students with LD. This suggests that the BERS may be useful in the EBD assessment process. Implications for future research are discussed.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 21, No. 6, 346-355 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100604
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Remedial and Special EducationHome page
E. J. Sabornie, C. Evans, and D. Cullinan
Comparing Characteristics of High-Incidence Disability Groups: A Descriptive Review
Remedial and Special Education, April 1, 2006; 27(2): 95 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
B. M. Uhing, P. Mooney, and G. R. Ryser
Differences in Strength Assessment Scores for Youth With and Without ED Across the Youth and Parent Rating Scales of the BERS-2
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2005; 13(3): 181 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
C. M. Walrath, E. Franco, Q. Liao, and E. W. Holden
Measures of Child Emotional and Behavioral Strengths and Family Functioning: A Preliminary Report on the Reliability and Validity of their Spanish Translations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 2004; 22(3): 209 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Research on Social Work PracticeHome page
M. H. Epstein, P. Mooney, G. Ryser, and C. D. Pierce
Validity and Reliability of the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (2nd Edition): Youth Rating Scale
Research on Social Work Practice, September 1, 2004; 14(5): 358 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
M. H. Epstein
The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A Strength-Based Approach to Assessment
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]