Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marston, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predicting Classroom Achievement From Active Responding on a Computer-Based Groupware System

Jongho Shin

University of Minnesota, shinx009{at}umn.edu

Stanley L. Deno

University of Minnesota

Steven L. Robinson

Discourse Technologies

Douglas Marston

Minneapolis Public Schools

The predictive validity of active responding on a computer-based groupware system was examined with 48 second graders. Students' achievement at the end of a school year (final performance) was predicted with two independent variables: (a) active responding during the school year and (b) achievement at the beginning of the school year (initial performance). The results showed that active responding correlated highly with initial and final performance measures and that active responding contributed significantly to predicting final performance when initial performance was controlled for. As expected, students with higher initial performance participated significantly more in classroom activities than did those with lower initial performance. We conclude that active responding on a computer-based groupware system can be used as a process variable indicative of later achievement and that classroom teachers can use students' active responding to formatively evaluate instruction.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 53-60 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/074193250002100107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?