Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mastropieri, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Scruggs, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Text Versus Hands-On Science Curriculum

Implications for Students with Disabilities

Margo A. Mastropieri

Margo A. Mastropieri is professor of special education at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Arizona State University in 1983. Her present research interests include teacher effectiveness, learning and memory strategies, and science education for students with disabilities.

Thomas E. Scruggs

Thomas E. Scruggs is professor of special education at Purdue University. He received his PhD from Arizona State University in 1982. His present research interests include research synthesis, elaborative learning strategies, and science education for students with disabilities. Address: Margo A. Mastropieri, Purdue University. Department of Educational Studies. Liberal Arts and Education Building. West Lafayette. IN 47906.

This paper describes recent educational reform efforts in science education and their potential impact on students with disabilities. An analysis of the curriculum in science education in four school districts from four different states is presented. Two districts employ a content approach using textbooks as the dominant instructional medium, while the other two districts employ a hands-on approach using manipulative activities and thematic units. Comparisons are made within and across the activities-oriented and textbook approaches. Implications for students with disabilities are discussed.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 15, No. 2, 72-85 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/074193259401500203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
G. A. Troia
Meaningful Assessment of Content-Area Literacy for Youth with and without Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2006; 31(2): 69 - 80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
C. K. Ormsbee and K. D. Finson
Modifying Science Activities and Materials to Enhance Instruction for Students with Learning and Behavioral Problems
Intervention in School and Clinic, September 1, 2000; 36(1): 10 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
S. J. Salend
Using an Activities-Based Approach to Teach Science to Students with Disabilities
Intervention in School and Clinic, November 1, 1998; 34(2): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
M. A. Mastropieri and T. E. Scruggs
Enhancing School Success with Mnemonic Strategies
Intervention in School and Clinic, March 1, 1998; 33(4): 201 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and K. Butcher
HOW EFFECTIVE IS INQUIRY LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD DISABILITIES?
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1997; 31(2): 199 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
G. Tindal and V. Nolet
SERVING STUDENTS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL CONTENT CLASSES: A HEURISTIC STUDY OF CRITICAL VARIABLES LINKING INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1996; 29(4): 414 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
R. G. McKenzie
Special Educators as Secondary Content Teachers: How Justifiable?
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, October 1, 1995; 18(4): 275 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
What makes Special Education Special? Evaluating Inclusion Programs with the Pass Variables
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1995; 29(2): 224 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
Successful Mainstreaming in Elementary Science Classes: A Qualitative Study of Three Reputational Cases
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1994; 31(4): 785 - 811.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
The Construction of Scientific Knowledge by Students with Mild Disabilities
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1994; 28(3): 307 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]