|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Text Versus Hands-On Science CurriculumImplications for Students with Disabilities
Margo A. Mastropieri
Margo A. Mastropieri is professor of special education at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Arizona State University in 1983. Her present research interests include teacher effectiveness, learning and memory strategies, and science education for students with disabilities.
Thomas E. Scruggs
Thomas E. Scruggs is professor of special education at Purdue University. He received his PhD from Arizona State University in 1982. His present research interests include research synthesis, elaborative learning strategies, and science education for students with disabilities. Address: Margo A. Mastropieri, Purdue University. Department of Educational Studies. Liberal Arts and Education Building. West Lafayette. IN 47906.
This paper describes recent educational reform efforts in science education and their potential impact on students with disabilities. An analysis of the curriculum in science education in four school districts from four different states is presented. Two districts employ a content approach using textbooks as the dominant instructional medium, while the other two districts employ a hands-on approach using manipulative activities and thematic units. Comparisons are made within and across the activities-oriented and textbook approaches. Implications for students with disabilities are discussed.
Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 15, No. 2,
72-85 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/074193259401500203

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Troia
Meaningful Assessment of Content-Area Literacy for Youth with and without Disabilities
Assessment for Effective Intervention,
January 1, 2006;
31(2):
69 - 80.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Ormsbee and K. D. Finson
Modifying Science Activities and Materials to Enhance Instruction for Students with Learning and Behavioral Problems
Intervention in School and Clinic,
September 1, 2000;
36(1):
10 - 21.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Salend
Using an Activities-Based Approach to Teach Science to Students with Disabilities
Intervention in School and Clinic,
November 1, 1998;
34(2):
67 - 72.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mastropieri and T. E. Scruggs
Enhancing School Success with Mnemonic Strategies
Intervention in School and Clinic,
March 1, 1998;
33(4):
201 - 208.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and K. Butcher
HOW EFFECTIVE IS INQUIRY LEARNING FOR STUDENTS WITH MILD DISABILITIES?
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1997;
31(2):
199 - 211.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Tindal and V. Nolet
SERVING STUDENTS IN MIDDLE SCHOOL CONTENT CLASSES: A HEURISTIC STUDY OF CRITICAL VARIABLES LINKING INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1996;
29(4):
414 - 432.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. McKenzie
Special Educators as Secondary Content Teachers: How Justifiable?
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children,
October 1, 1995;
18(4):
275 - 282.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
What makes Special Education Special? Evaluating Inclusion Programs with the Pass Variables
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1995;
29(2):
224 - 233.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
Successful Mainstreaming in Elementary Science Classes: A Qualitative Study of Three Reputational Cases
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1994;
31(4):
785 - 811.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Scruggs and M. A. Mastropieri
The Construction of Scientific Knowledge by Students with Mild Disabilities
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1994;
28(3):
307 - 321.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|