Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Remedial and Special Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haskell, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Swank, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Three Orthographic/Phonological Units on First-Grade Reading

Dorothy W. Haskell

Dorothy W. Haskell is director of the Educational Therapy Center in Houston, Texas. She received her EdD in educational psychology from the University of Houston.

Barbara R. Foorman

Barbara R. Foorman is associate professor of educational psychology at the University of Houston, where she conducts research on children's cognitive development and reading and language acquisition. She received her PhD in education from the University of California, Berkeley. Address: Barbara Foorman, Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5874.

Paul R. Swank

Paul R. Swank is associate professor of educational psychology at the University of Houston, where he conducts research on school evaluation and research methodology. He received his PhD in statistics and research methodology from the University of Northern Colorado.

This investigation examined whether instruction at the onset—rime level (e.g., "b—at") facilitates first graders' accuracy in word reading more than instruction at the whole word-level ("bat") or phoneme level ("b—a—t"). Forty-eight first graders were randomly assigned to phoneme, onset—rime, whole-word, or unseen control (receiving whole-language instruction in the classroom) groups and trained with individual cardboard letter sets in 15 twenty-minute sessions over a 6-week period. Groups were comparable on pretests of intellectual ability, phonemic segmentation, reading achievement, and ability to read 40 regular and 20 exception words. On the posttest of these 60 words, the phoneme and onset-rime groups were significantly more accurate than the whole-word groups, and there was a tendency for the onset—rime group to outperform the other three groups. Moreover, there was a tendency for phoneme students to be more accurate on regular words and onset—rime students to be more accurate on exception words.

Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, 40-49 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/074193259201300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Visual ImpairmentHome page
S. Crawford, R. T. Elliott, and K. Hoekman
Phoneme, grapheme, onset-rime and word analysis in braille with young children
British Journal of Visual Impairment, September 1, 2006; 24(3): 108 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. W. Lovett, L. Lacerenza, and S. L. Borden
Putting Struggling Readers on the PHAST Track: A Program to Integrate Phonological and Strategy-Based Remedial Reading Instruction and Maximize Outcomes
J Learn Disabil, September 1, 2000; 33(5): 458 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
D. J. Chard and E. J. Kameenui
Struggling First-Grade Readers: The Frequency and Progress of Their Reading
Journal of Special Education, April 1, 2000; 34(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
R. Boone, K. Higgins, and D. Williams
Computer-Based Multimedia and Videodiscs: Uses in Supporting Content-Area Instruction for Students with LD
Intervention in School and Clinic, May 1, 1997; 32(5): 302 - 311.
[PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
R. GERSTEN and S. U. BRENGELMAN
The Quest to Translate Research Into Classroom Practice: The Emerging Knowledge Base
Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1996; 17(2): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
W. R. KITZ and H. W. THORPE
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Videodisc and Traditional Algebra Instruction for College-age Students with Learning Disabilities
Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1995; 16(5): 295 - 306.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
J. CIBOROWSKI
Using Textbooks with Students Who Cannot Read Them
Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1995; 16(2): 90 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]